|
Marking criteria |
Allocated Mark |
|
Abstract |
Total: 1 mark |
|
What is the aim of the report and major findings? |
1 |
|
Introduction |
Total: 2 marks |
|
Does the introduction effectively orientate the reader to the topic area? |
1 |
|
Does the introduction specify the problem to be addressed and clarify the purpose of the report? |
1 |
|
Methods |
Total: 2 marks |
|
Tells your readers “how” you find the references, which method you have used to analyse the references and address the problem. What are the issues that you have considered? |
|
|
How the references were searched and found? |
1 |
|
What are the processes used to analyse the references? |
1 |
|
Findings |
Total: 4 marks |
|
What are the SCM process in each company? What are the similarities and differences between these two companies? |
1 |
|
What kind of IT-solution(s) has/have been applied in which stage(s) of the SCM in each company? What are the similarities and differences between these two companies? |
1 |
|
How effective is the use of each IT-solution in each company? What are the similarities and differences between these two companies? |
1 |
|
How can each company improve its IT-solution(s) used in SCM? |
1 |
|
Discussion |
Total: 3 marks |
|
What can we learn from your report? (aim-related, results relative to the gaps) |
1 |
|
What are the contributions and limitations of your research? |
1 |
|
What are the future research directions on IT-enabled SCM? |
1 |
|
Conclusion |
Total: 2 marks |
|
Summary of problems, objectives, findings and contributions |
2 |
|
General quality requirement |
Total: 4 marks |
|
The results are evidence-based |
1 |
|
The reasoning is logically sound and of high clarity and the paragraphs are well structured and linked |
1 |
|
Consistency of required referencing style |
1 |
|
Professional presentation of written work (layout, fonts, headings, spelling and grammar) |
1 |
|
Individual contribution |
Total: 2 marks |
|
Describe contribution of each member in term of percentage |
1 |
|
Quality of academic writing of each member |
1 |
|
Total marks |
20 |
